« Affiliate Summit West 2010 | Main | Affiliate Summit West 2010 »

01/22/2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jeff Weber

The provision which applies all payments over the minimum to the balance with the highest interest rate is one of the best parts of the bill. Before, banks would use 0% balance transfers to entice people to move more debt over, but all payments would be used to reduce the debt at 0% instead of whatever high interest balance was there in the first place.

Jesse Niesen

In theory and going forward these new laws are great, BUT WATCH OUT for all of the "exceptions" to many of the protections offered by these new rules.

In the meantime, most of my subscribers and clients have experienced their credit limits lowered (harming their credit scores and credit worthiness), interest rated hiked up (increasing their monthly payments and debt-to-income ratios) and creditors switching to variable rates as opposed to fixed rates (leaving them vulnerable to greater expense and liability).

It looks good for Obama to have passed these reforms us, but the timing of it has worked against the average consumer; increasing debt amounts, jacking up minimum payments and harming credit scores to create a negative snowball into less available, more expensive credit card debt for the masses.

Thus far, these new protections have proven to be more "creditor friendly" laws.

One thing remains true: financial education and literacy is more valuable than ever, and far to costly to ignore.

Deanna Templeton

So right, Jesse. The timing was way off and gave credit card companies the time to proactively and methodically get all of their changes (interest rate increases, lower credit limits, account closings, etc.) in place before the law went into effect. On the flip side of things, the credit card issuers are in the business of making money so I can understand WHY they would do what they've done (not that I agree with it, but I see their side from a business perspective.) Personally I think the whole CARD Act had more of a political agenda than a consumer agenda. The CARD Act was a great idea in theory, and there ARE a couple of things that will actually benefit consumers - like the biggie that Jeff mentioned about the payments going towards the highest interest rate first. But like you said, consumer's should keep a close eye on their accounts and READ their account statements because wherever there's a law, there's usually some type of loophole somewhere in the mix. And if creditors can't make their profits through their normal means, they'll find other more creative approaches. It's just business where they're concerned.

The comments to this entry are closed.